November 9, 2016 – Notes

In attendance: Liz Clarke, Vivian Krone, Janice Loschiavo, Lois Pagnozzi, Meta Pitrelli, Cathy Quinn, Sharon Rome, Barbara Santillo, Tina Segali, Marilyn Sinisi

Absent: Joan Swensen (in Florida).

Emeritus: Donna Sabetta, Jeri Stangl.

Book & Author: The Road to Character, by David Brooks

Held in Vivian’s inviting apartment with the million-dollar view, November’s book club meeting was notable for the absence of talk of politics just a day after the surprising election results. The spirited discussion started in the living room and continued around the dining table during dinner.

Notes and comments:

  • Meta confessed that she hadn’t read the book cover to cover, though she thought it was an excellent selection for the book club. Most agreed that the book wasn’t one you couldn’t wait to get back to but was accessible and relatable.
  • Brooks’ use of the representative figures of Adam I and Adam II was referenced throughout the meeting. Most agreed with his examples of humility and the lack thereof: the football players today who celebrate their every tackle, and the lack of grandstanding among those who helped win WWII.
  • Some disagreed with Brooks’ negative take on the Dr. Seuss book Oh, the Places You’ll Go! There was mention of the type of parent who is constantly driving his son or daughter to be the best, to excel at everything.
  • In response to Barbara’s question about whether pressure strengthens character, the members felt that it depends on the child. Kids generally need a push. Parents want their kids to be able to do what they couldn’t do. But they need to allow their children the leeway to make mistakes, and learn from them.
  • Do mistakes help us to learn? Vivian spoke about a friend who cautioned her daughter to not do anything that can’t be reversed.
  • The group found the stories of Frances Perkins and Dwight Eisenhower the most interesting and apt, but felt that personal stories of not-so-famous people would have added humanity to the book.
  • Some felt Brooks evinced misplaced nostalgia about the “greatest generation” and that time period. Lois pointed out that there were a lot of things not so great about the 40s and 50s (racism, sexism, homophobia, etc.).
  • The message some received from the book was that we need to have balance in our lives and be the model of what we believe on moral issues.
  • It was suggested that Brooks may have written the book in reaction to a very bad divorce for which he may have felt responsible. In the book, he may actually be talking to himself.
  • Lois mentioned the book Etched in Sand, by Regina Calcaterra, that deals with the true story of five siblings who survive an unspeakable childhood on Long Island.
  • Some felt that our lives are a journey during which we should always strive to improve and to grow. The issue of giving to others was discussed with passionate examples. Many stories about Gene Pagnozzi were shared. All agreed that it was also important to accept that we can’t always do everything we would like.
  • Barbara noted that Brooks writes better op-ed pieces than books and opined that Therese’s book was better than this one. (!)

Despite the lively discussion, the book received a 2.5 rating, which led to the perennial discussion of the rating system. Lois suggested that perhaps after the next book, we should scrap the rating system entirely since we have never been able to create a model upon which the books are judged. We agreed to give it some thought and address it at the next meeting.

Next Meeting: Wednesday, December 7 (Pearl Harbor Day, as Cathy pointed out), beginning at 5:00 p.m., at Tina’s house, 662 Oakley Place, Oradell. Sharon will bring dessert, Meta will bring fruit and Marilyn will take care of the lottery tickets.

Next Book: selected by Tina, is The Underground Railroad, by Colson Whitehead. January’s book will be selected by Marilyn.

Submitted by Tina Segali

November 15, 2016

NY Times’ review of The Underground Railroad


By Colson Whitehead

306 pp. Doubleday. $26.95.

Colson Whitehead’s novels are rebellious creatures: Each one of them goes to great lengths to break free of the last one, of its structure and language, of its areas of interest. At the same time, they all have one thing in common — the will to work within a recognizable tract of popular culture, taking advantage of conventions while subverting them for the novel’s own purposes. “The Intuitionist,” with its dystopian concerns and futuristic mood, gave way to the folkloric past of “John Henry Days”; “Zone One,” Whitehead’s contribution to the unquenchable American thirst for zombies, was his departure from “Sag Harbor,” with its coming-of-age feeling and concessions to nostalgia. His new novel, “The Underground Railroad,” is as different as can be from the zombie book. It touches on the historical novel and the slave story, but what it does with those genres is striking and imaginative. Like its predecessors, it is carefully built and stunningly daring; it is also, both in expected and unexpected ways, dense, substantial and important.

The central conceit of the novel is as simple as it is bold. The underground railroad is not, in Whitehead’s novel, the secret network of passageways and safe houses used by runaway slaves to reach the free North from their slaveholding states. Or rather it is that, but it is something else, too: You open a trap door in the safe house or find the entrance to a hidden cave, and you reach an actual railroad, with actual locomotives and boxcars and conductors, sometimes complete with benches on the platform. “Two steel rails ran the visible length of the tunnel,” Whitehead writes, “pinned into the dirt by wooden crossties. The steel ran south and north presumably, springing from some inconceivable source and shooting toward a miraculous terminus.” The trains pass at unpredictable times and go to unpredictable places, but that is obviously good enough for those wanting to flee the misery and violence of slavery: its sheer inhumanity, a word that in Whitehead’s unflinching explorations seems to fill up with new meanings.

Meet Cora, a young slave on a Georgia cotton plantation. Her mother ran away when Cora was a little girl, and that feeling of abandonment has haunted her ever since. When she is approached by another slave about the underground railroad, she hesitates; but then life, in the form of rape and humiliation, gives her the nudge she needs. (Whitehead does here as he will do several times in the book: He opens his eyes where the rest of us would rather look away. In this, “The Underground Railroad” is courageous but never gratuitous.) In order to ensure her escape, she kills a white man, and soon she is being pursued by a notorious slave catcher named Ridgeway, a man straight out of Cormac McCarthy, whose assistant wears a necklace made with human ears. What follows is Cora’s uncertain itinerary through hell. The novel uses the architecture of an episodic tale, each episode corresponding to a new stop in the journey — the two Carolinas, then Tennessee, then Indiana — each one introducing Cora to new incarnations of evil, or the evil brought out in everyone by the poisonous mechanics of slavery.

In one of the towns, Cora realizes that an apparently well-meaning medical center is in fact an experiment in eugenics or even genocide; in North Carolina, the bodies of tortured and burned people, both blacks and the whites who help them, hang from the trees along something called the Freedom Trail. And we begin to notice, as readers, slight departures from historical fact, places where “The Underground Railroad” becomes something much more interesting than a historical novel. It doesn’t merely tell us about what happened; it also tells us what might have happened. Whitehead’s imagination, unconstrained by stubborn facts, takes the novel to new places in the narrative of slavery, or rather to places where it actually has something new to say. If the role of the novel, as Milan Kundera argues in a beautiful essay, is to say what only the novel can say, “The Underground Railroad” achieves the task by small shifts in perspective: It moves a couple of feet to one side, and suddenly there are strange skyscrapers on the ground of the American South and a railroad running under it, and the novel is taking us somewhere we have never been before.

One of the most eloquent passages of the novel — and one that illustrates the way Whitehead’s imagination goes about its business — takes place in the Museum of Natural Wonders, in South Carolina. It is a limestone building occupying an ­entire block; when Cora arrives and asks where she should begin cleaning, she discovers that is not what is expected of her. There is a section of the museum called Living History. Like a railroad, explains the curator, the museum allows its visitors to “see the rest of the country beyond their small experience.” Cora realizes her task is to go behind a glass and act her part in a depiction of the slave experience, all this while the visitors look intensely at her from the other side. One room is called “Scenes From Darkest Africa”; another is “Life on the Slave Ship.” While Cora plays her part (silently, dutifully) in the static scenes, she begins to question their accuracy. The curator, Whitehead writes, “did concede that spinning wheels were not often used outdoors,” but counters that “while authenticity was their watchword, the dimensions of the room forced certain concessions.” And later Cora reflects:

“No slave had ever keeled over dead at a spinning wheel or been butchered for a tangle. But nobody wanted to speak on the true disposition of the world. And no one wanted to hear it. Certainly not the white monsters on the other side of the exhibit at that very moment, pushing their greasy snouts against the window, sneering and hooting. Truth was a changing display in a shop window, manipulated by hands when you weren’t looking, alluring and ever out of reach.”

“The Underground Railroad” is also about the myriad ways in which black history has too often been stolen by white narrators. At a performance Cora sees from a distance, a slave is played by “a white man in burned cork, pink showing on his neck and wrists.” Remembering the passages on slavery contained in the Bible, Cora blames the people who wrote them down: “People always got things wrong,” she thinks, “on purpose as much as by accident.” Whitehead’s novel is constantly concerned with these matters of narrative authenticity and authority, and so too with the different versions of the past we carry with us. Throughout my reading, I was repeatedly reminded of a particular chapter from García Márquez’s “One Hundred Years of Solitude,” to whose handling of time Whitehead seems to owe quite a bit. In that chapter, the infamous massacre of the banana plantation workers is denied by the official versions of history and soon forgotten. But one character knows what he saw — thousands of dead traveling toward the sea on a train — and goes around trying to find someone who will remember the story. He doesn’t: People always get things wrong. In a sense, “The Underground Railroad” is Whitehead’s own attempt at getting things right, not by telling us what we already know but by vindicating the powers of fiction to interpret the world. In its exploration of the foundational sins of America, it is a brave and necessary book.